Disciplinary Actions Overview – Rockford Police Department

Over the past decade, the Rockford Police Department has faced several instances of officer misconduct, including cases of sexual assault, excessive use of force, and violations of departmental policies. Specific statistics on the total number of disciplinary actions are not publicly disclosed. Common violations include excessive force and unprofessional conduct. Disciplinary measures range from administrative leave and mandatory training to termination of employment. Use-of-force incidents have led to both internal investigations and public scrutiny. The department has also faced criticism for policies that may hinder the investigation and discipline of officer misconduct, such as requiring sworn affidavits for complaints, which can discourage reporting. ([illinoispolicy.org](https://www.illinoispolicy.org/reports/police-union-contracts-hinder-discipline-in-illinois-biggest-cities-2/?utm_source=openai))

Forum Links

Posted in Audits Law Enforcement Agencies: Officer Names:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Welcome to Police Accountability Database

Our Mission

We're building a comprehensive database of police interactions to promote accountability and transparency in law enforcement.

How You Can Participate

  • View the Blog: Read about documented police interactions
  • Share Your Experience: Submit your own police interaction story
  • Browse the Forums: Check if your local law enforcement has been documented

Important Community Guidelines

It is strictly against our rules to:

  • Make threats of any kind
  • Share private information such as personal emails, home addresses, or phone numbers

Violation of these rules will result in immediate content removal and possible account suspension.

Why This Matters

By organizing this data, we can potentially demonstrate when officers were previously aware of laws they later claim ignorance of, challenging qualified immunity defenses and promoting accountability.