Disciplinary Actions Overview – Cicero Police Department

The Cicero Police Department has faced multiple lawsuits and allegations over the past decade, highlighting systemic issues within the department. Notable cases include allegations of racial discrimination, retaliation, and sexual harassment involving high-ranking officers. Specific statistics on the total number of disciplinary actions, types of violations, and their frequency are not publicly detailed. However, these cases suggest a pattern of serious misconduct and civil rights violations. Typical punishments have ranged from suspensions to terminations, though the effectiveness and consistency of these measures have been questioned. Use-of-force incidents and their outcomes have not been comprehensively reported in the available sources. Department-wide scandals, such as the involvement of top officials in corruption and misconduct, have further tarnished the department’s reputation and raised concerns about accountability and oversight. ([law.justia.com](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/illinois/ilndce/1%3A2020cv01917/374748/60/?utm_source=openai)

Forum Links

Posted in Audits Law Enforcement Agencies: Officer Names:

Welcome to Police Accountability Database

Our Mission

We're building a comprehensive database of police interactions to promote accountability and transparency in law enforcement.

How You Can Participate

  • View the Blog: Read about documented police interactions
  • Share Your Experience: Submit your own police interaction story
  • Browse the Forums: Check if your local law enforcement has been documented

Important Community Guidelines

It is strictly against our rules to:

  • Make threats of any kind
  • Share private information such as personal emails, home addresses, or phone numbers

Violation of these rules will result in immediate content removal and possible account suspension.

Why This Matters

By organizing this data, we can potentially demonstrate when officers were previously aware of laws they later claim ignorance of, challenging qualified immunity defenses and promoting accountability.