Deputy Thom was involved in the case with Mr. Hilliard, where he provided observations regarding Hilliard’s behavior, suggesting possible impairment. Hilliard alleged that Thom’s observations contributed to the discriminatory actions taken against him. The court found that Thom’s testimony was relevant and allowed the claims to proceed. ([law.justia.com](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/idaho/iddce/1%3A2018cv00550/42734/56/?utm_source=openai))