Disciplinary Actions Overview – Goffstown Police Department

Home › Forums › New Hampshire › Goffstown Police Department › Disciplinary Actions Overview – Goffstown Police Department

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 25, 2025 at 7:27 am #16157 Reply
    CBKN76
    Keymaster

    As of March 2025, specific data on disciplinary actions within the Goffstown Police Department is not publicly available. However, statewide, the New Hampshire Police Standards and Training Council (PSTC) oversees officer certification and can suspend or revoke certifications for misconduct. The New Hampshire Department of Justice investigates officer-involved shootings, with most found justified between 2005 and 2016. Notable cases in the state include the 2014 Seabrook incident, where officers were fired and one served jail time for assault, and the 2016 Nashua case, where a state trooper received a suspended sentence and agreed never to work in law enforcement again. ([citizenscount.org](https://www.citizenscount.org/issues/police-brutality?utm_source=openai))

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
Reply To: Disciplinary Actions Overview – Goffstown Police Department
Your information:




Welcome to Police Accountability Database

Our Mission

We're building a comprehensive database of police interactions to promote accountability and transparency in law enforcement.

How You Can Participate

  • View the Blog: Read about documented police interactions
  • Share Your Experience: Submit your own police interaction story
  • Browse the Forums: Check if your local law enforcement has been documented

Important Community Guidelines

It is strictly against our rules to:

  • Make threats of any kind
  • Share private information such as personal emails, home addresses, or phone numbers

Violation of these rules will result in immediate content removal and possible account suspension.

Why This Matters

By organizing this data, we can potentially demonstrate when officers were previously aware of laws they later claim ignorance of, challenging qualified immunity defenses and promoting accountability.