Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #23335 Reply
    CBKN76
    Keymaster

    Former Deputy Tyler Ebell engaged in a romantic and sexual relationship with inmate Nastaza Schmidt while she was incarcerated and after her release. He provided her with contraband, including food, books, and jewelry, and used law enforcement databases to access information about her and her associates. Ebell also financially assisted Schmidt’s bail and ignored evidence of her criminal activities. Following an internal investigation, he was issued a notice of proposed dismissal for charges including dishonesty, corrupt use of official authority, and acts incompatible with public service. Ebell resigned before the dismissal was finalized. His case has been forwarded to the California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training for potential decertification. Additionally, Ebell is the subject of an active criminal investigation by the Ventura County Sheriff’s Office. ([vcstar.com](https://www.vcstar.com/story/news/local/2023/06/16/ventura-county-sheriffs-deputy-out-after-affair-with-jail-inmate/70306330007/?utm_source=openai))

    [Return to blog post](https://watchaudits.com/tyler-ebell-ventura-county-sheriffs-office/)

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
Reply To: Tyler Ebell
Your information:




Welcome to Police Accountability Database

Our Mission

We're building a comprehensive database of police interactions to promote accountability and transparency in law enforcement.

How You Can Participate

  • View the Blog: Read about documented police interactions
  • Share Your Experience: Submit your own police interaction story
  • Browse the Forums: Check if your local law enforcement has been documented

Important Community Guidelines

It is strictly against our rules to:

  • Make threats of any kind
  • Share private information such as personal emails, home addresses, or phone numbers

Violation of these rules will result in immediate content removal and possible account suspension.

Why This Matters

By organizing this data, we can potentially demonstrate when officers were previously aware of laws they later claim ignorance of, challenging qualified immunity defenses and promoting accountability.