Dan Coverley – Douglas County Sheriff’s Department

In September 2022, Sheriff Dan Coverley was cited for violating state ethics law by appearing at political campaign events in his sheriff’s uniform, endorsing U.S. Senate candidate Adam Laxalt. The Nevada Ethics Commission determined this was against the law, as it constituted using governmental property to benefit a personal interest. Coverley accepted responsibility, agreed to hold a training session with his staff to ensure compliance, and committed not to wear his uniform at campaign events. Additionally, in 2020, Coverley faced criticism for telling the Douglas County library director not to call his department if they needed help, following the library’s support of Black Lives Matter. This statement drew national attention and led to a protest that was met with a massive counter-protest. In 2001, Coverley was sued for use of excessive force in Carson City. He was disciplined and suspended for one day for using an improper lifting technique but was cleared of excessive use of force charges.

## Officer Forum Links:
– [Dan Coverley](https://watchaudits.com/forums/topic/dan-coverley/)

Forum Links

Posted in Audits Law Enforcement Agencies: Officer Names: States:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Welcome to Police Accountability Database

Our Mission

We're building a comprehensive database of police interactions to promote accountability and transparency in law enforcement.

How You Can Participate

  • View the Blog: Read about documented police interactions
  • Share Your Experience: Submit your own police interaction story
  • Browse the Forums: Check if your local law enforcement has been documented

Important Community Guidelines

It is strictly against our rules to:

  • Make threats of any kind
  • Share private information such as personal emails, home addresses, or phone numbers

Violation of these rules will result in immediate content removal and possible account suspension.

Why This Matters

By organizing this data, we can potentially demonstrate when officers were previously aware of laws they later claim ignorance of, challenging qualified immunity defenses and promoting accountability.