Audits

Deputy Troy Haymore – Cochise County Sheriff’s Office

Written by CBKN76

In August 2019, Deputy Haymore rear-ended a stopped vehicle at nearly 70 mph while responding to a domestic violence call. The investigation revealed he was traveling at about 107 mph five seconds before impact. Haymore was cited for failure to control speed to avoid an accident, completed a defensive driving program, and received a letter of reprimand. A negligence lawsuit was filed against him and Cochise County by the victim, Richard T. Speer, seeking $125,000 in damages. ([arizonadailyindependent.com](https://arizonadailyindependent.com/deputys-high-speed-accident-leads-to-lawsuit-against-cochise-county/?utm_source=openai))

## Officer Forum Links:
– [Deputy Troy Haymore](https://watchaudits.com/forums/topic/deputy-troy-haymore/)

## Officer Forum Links:
– [Deputy Troy Haymore](https://watchaudits.com/forums/topic/deputy-troy-haymore/)

Forum Links

Browse Arizona Forums Browse Cochise County Sheriff's Office Browse Deputy Troy Haymore
Posted in Audits Law Enforcement Agencies: Officer Names: States:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Welcome to Police Accountability Database

Our Mission

We're building a comprehensive database of police interactions to promote accountability and transparency in law enforcement.

How You Can Participate

  • View the Blog: Read about documented police interactions
  • Share Your Experience: Submit your own police interaction story
  • Browse the Forums: Check if your local law enforcement has been documented

Important Community Guidelines

It is strictly against our rules to:

  • Make threats of any kind
  • Share private information such as personal emails, home addresses, or phone numbers

Violation of these rules will result in immediate content removal and possible account suspension.

Why This Matters

By organizing this data, we can potentially demonstrate when officers were previously aware of laws they later claim ignorance of, challenging qualified immunity defenses and promoting accountability.