- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 2 months, 1 week ago by .
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Create And Track Police Department History
Home › Forums › Arizona › Cochise County Sheriff’s Office › Deputy Troy Haymore
In August 2019, Deputy Haymore rear-ended a stopped vehicle at nearly 70 mph while responding to a domestic violence call. The investigation revealed he was traveling at about 107 mph five seconds before impact. Haymore was cited for failure to control speed to avoid an accident, completed a defensive driving program, and received a letter of reprimand. A negligence lawsuit was filed against him and Cochise County by the victim, Richard T. Speer, seeking $125,000 in damages. ([arizonadailyindependent.com](https://arizonadailyindependent.com/deputys-high-speed-accident-leads-to-lawsuit-against-cochise-county/?utm_source=openai))
[Return to blog post](https://watchaudits.com/deputy-troy-haymore-cochise-county-sheriffs-office/)
In August 2019, Deputy Troy Haymore rear-ended a stopped vehicle at nearly 70 mph while responding to a domestic violence call. The collision resulted in a negligence lawsuit against him and Cochise County. An investigation revealed Haymore was traveling at about 107 mph five seconds before impact and had decreased to 92 mph two seconds before impact. He was cited for failing to control speed to avoid an accident and completed a defensive driving school program. Additionally, he received a letter of reprimand from his lieutenant. The lawsuit filed by the victim sought $125,000 in damages for physical injuries, pain and suffering, medical expenses, vehicle damage, and loss of well-being.
[Return to blog post](https://watchaudits.com/deputy-troy-haymore-cochise-county-sheriffs-office-2/)
We're building a comprehensive database of police interactions to promote accountability and transparency in law enforcement.
It is strictly against our rules to:
Violation of these rules will result in immediate content removal and possible account suspension.
By organizing this data, we can potentially demonstrate when officers were previously aware of laws they later claim ignorance of, challenging qualified immunity defenses and promoting accountability.