Audits

Chance Corbett – Auburn University Department of Public Safety

Written by CBKN76

In May 2018, Cameron Boozer, a supervisor in the Campus Safety and Security Department since 2008, filed a lawsuit alleging racial discrimination. Boozer claimed that his boss, acting director Chance Corbett, passed him over for a promotion in favor of a less experienced white candidate. Boozer stated he had no disciplinary actions against him and had outstanding performance evaluations. The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. ([wcbi.com](https://www.wcbi.com/second-auburn-university-employee-sues-racial-discrimination/?utm_source=openai))

## Officer Forum Links:
– [Chance Corbett](https://watchaudits.com/forums/topic/chance-corbett/)

## Officer Forum Links:
– [Chance Corbett](https://watchaudits.com/forums/topic/chance-corbett/)

Forum Links

Browse Alabama Forums Browse Auburn University Department of Public Safety Browse Chance Corbett
Posted in Audits Law Enforcement Agencies: Officer Names: States:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Welcome to Police Accountability Database

Our Mission

We're building a comprehensive database of police interactions to promote accountability and transparency in law enforcement.

How You Can Participate

  • View the Blog: Read about documented police interactions
  • Share Your Experience: Submit your own police interaction story
  • Browse the Forums: Check if your local law enforcement has been documented

Important Community Guidelines

It is strictly against our rules to:

  • Make threats of any kind
  • Share private information such as personal emails, home addresses, or phone numbers

Violation of these rules will result in immediate content removal and possible account suspension.

Why This Matters

By organizing this data, we can potentially demonstrate when officers were previously aware of laws they later claim ignorance of, challenging qualified immunity defenses and promoting accountability.