Deputy Brian LaFrance – Kitsap County Sheriff’s Office

Deputy Brian LaFrance was terminated in 2001 after 29 documented incidents of misconduct, including untruthfulness, mishandling evidence, and disobeying direct orders. His behavior, which began in May 2000, included working outside his regular shift without permission and maintaining an unacceptable number of open cases. Despite repeated warnings, his obsessive behavior increased, leading to his reassignment and eventual suspension. An arbitrator later reduced his penalty to three final written warnings, citing apparent mental health issues, and ordered his reinstatement. However, the Washington Supreme Court ultimately upheld his termination, emphasizing the importance of honesty and integrity in law enforcement. ([law.justia.com](https://law.justia.com/cases/washington/supreme-court/2009/807205-opn.html?utm_source=openai))

## Officer Forum Links:
– [Deputy Brian LaFrance](https://watchaudits.com/forums/topic/deputy-brian-lafrance/)

Forum Links

Posted in Audits Law Enforcement Agencies: Officer Names: States:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Welcome to Police Accountability Database

Our Mission

We're building a comprehensive database of police interactions to promote accountability and transparency in law enforcement.

How You Can Participate

  • View the Blog: Read about documented police interactions
  • Share Your Experience: Submit your own police interaction story
  • Browse the Forums: Check if your local law enforcement has been documented

Important Community Guidelines

It is strictly against our rules to:

  • Make threats of any kind
  • Share private information such as personal emails, home addresses, or phone numbers

Violation of these rules will result in immediate content removal and possible account suspension.

Why This Matters

By organizing this data, we can potentially demonstrate when officers were previously aware of laws they later claim ignorance of, challenging qualified immunity defenses and promoting accountability.