Deputy Jeremy Rancher – Greene County Sheriff’s Office

In March 2014, Deputy Jeremy Rancher was involved in an incident where he discharged an X-26 Taser, striking an individual with multiple bursts of electrical current. The individual alleged that the use of the Taser constituted excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The case was brought before the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, where the court examined the facts and circumstances surrounding the arrest and the use of force. The court considered factors such as the severity of the crime, whether the suspect posed an immediate threat, and whether the suspect was actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arrest by flight. The court also addressed the defense of qualified immunity raised by Deputy Rancher. The outcome of the case included discussions on the reasonableness of the force used and the applicability of qualified immunity. The case citation is Bryant v. Greene County, Alabama et al, No. 7:2014cv00519 (N.D. Ala. 2014).

## Officer Forum Links:
– [Deputy Jeremy Rancher](https://watchaudits.com/forums/topic/deputy-jeremy-rancher/)

Forum Links

Posted in Audits Law Enforcement Agencies: Officer Names: States:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Welcome to Police Accountability Database

Our Mission

We're building a comprehensive database of police interactions to promote accountability and transparency in law enforcement.

How You Can Participate

  • View the Blog: Read about documented police interactions
  • Share Your Experience: Submit your own police interaction story
  • Browse the Forums: Check if your local law enforcement has been documented

Important Community Guidelines

It is strictly against our rules to:

  • Make threats of any kind
  • Share private information such as personal emails, home addresses, or phone numbers

Violation of these rules will result in immediate content removal and possible account suspension.

Why This Matters

By organizing this data, we can potentially demonstrate when officers were previously aware of laws they later claim ignorance of, challenging qualified immunity defenses and promoting accountability.