Disciplinary Actions Overview – Stamford Police Department

Over the past five years, the Stamford Police Department investigated 81 complaints, with approximately 25% (20 cases) found fully substantiated. About 60% (49 cases) were deemed unsubstantiated, and 6 cases were partially substantiated. Common violations included misconduct during extra-duty assignments and inappropriate conduct during traffic control duties. Typical punishments ranged from temporary reassignments to desk duty to participation in pretrial probation programs. The department faced challenges in handling complaints, with reports of difficulties in filing complaints and potential deviations from best practices in complaint processing. Notably, an internal investigation in 2019 revealed irregularities in extra-duty assignments, leading to the retirement and subsequent arrest of four officers involved in a fraudulent scheme. ([stamfordadvocate.com](https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/article/advocates-say-police-drop-the-ball-on-misconduct-6406.php?utm_source=openai)

Forum Links

Posted in Audits Law Enforcement Agencies: Officer Names:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Welcome to Police Accountability Database

Our Mission

We're building a comprehensive database of police interactions to promote accountability and transparency in law enforcement.

How You Can Participate

  • View the Blog: Read about documented police interactions
  • Share Your Experience: Submit your own police interaction story
  • Browse the Forums: Check if your local law enforcement has been documented

Important Community Guidelines

It is strictly against our rules to:

  • Make threats of any kind
  • Share private information such as personal emails, home addresses, or phone numbers

Violation of these rules will result in immediate content removal and possible account suspension.

Why This Matters

By organizing this data, we can potentially demonstrate when officers were previously aware of laws they later claim ignorance of, challenging qualified immunity defenses and promoting accountability.