Erik Andersen – Post Falls Police Department

Home Forums Idaho Post Falls Police Department Erik Andersen – Post Falls Police Department

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #12911 Reply
    CBKN76
    Keymaster

    Officer Erik Andersen was involved in multiple incidents of misconduct during his tenure with the Post Falls Police Department. In June 2004, he received a letter of counseling for inappropriate use of handcuffs during a stop of a bicyclist riding at night without lights. In January 2005, he was verbally reprimanded for inappropriate force during the arrest of Bradley Platt, who subsequently filed a $500,000 lawsuit against the city for injuries sustained during the arrest. Andersen was also suspended for three days for insubordination and retaliation against co-workers involved in internal investigations. In March 2006, he was accused of threatening a motorist with a Taser during a traffic stop, leading to his termination in May 2006. Andersen later filed a $500,000 tort claim against the city alleging wrongful termination. ([spokesman.com](https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2007/jan/31/police-investigation-cites-history-of-misconduct/?utm_source=openai))

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
Reply To: Erik Andersen – Post Falls Police Department
Your information:




Welcome to Police Accountability Database

Our Mission

We're building a comprehensive database of police interactions to promote accountability and transparency in law enforcement.

How You Can Participate

  • View the Blog: Read about documented police interactions
  • Share Your Experience: Submit your own police interaction story
  • Browse the Forums: Check if your local law enforcement has been documented

Important Community Guidelines

It is strictly against our rules to:

  • Make threats of any kind
  • Share private information such as personal emails, home addresses, or phone numbers

Violation of these rules will result in immediate content removal and possible account suspension.

Why This Matters

By organizing this data, we can potentially demonstrate when officers were previously aware of laws they later claim ignorance of, challenging qualified immunity defenses and promoting accountability.