In the case of Brissette v. Franklin County Sheriff’s Office, the court found overwhelming evidence of deliberate retaliation against plaintiffs Susan Heath and Cynthia Brissette for their complaints about discrimination. The retaliation included hyper-scrutiny of their work, secret investigations, aggressive questioning, inappropriate discipline, and lack of support. Both plaintiffs suffered significant emotional distress and medical symptoms as a result. The court awarded each plaintiff $150,000 in compensatory damages. Specific incidents included unwarranted reprimands, forced attendance at training academies under humiliating circumstances, and disproportionate disciplinary actions compared to male counterparts. The court concluded that the plaintiffs engaged in protected conduct and suffered adverse employment actions as a result, with no credible, legitimate justification articulated by the defendants. The evidence demonstrated that the defendants’ actions were intentionally designed to punish the plaintiffs for their legitimate complaints and deter others from objecting to the hostile environment prevailing at the Franklin County Sheriff’s Office.
[Return to blog post](https://watchaudits.com/no-specific-officer-identified-franklin-county-sheriffs-office/)
.
