Home Forums Utah Cache County Sheriff’s Office Officer Adams

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #19115 Reply
    CBKN76
    Keymaster

    In 2019, Officer Adams was involved in a lawsuit filed by inmate Mr. Rowland, who alleged that Adams confiscated and destroyed his religious rune paper without notice or opportunity to be heard, violating his rights to due process and free exercise of religion. The court found that Adams was entitled to qualified immunity, shielding him from further litigation in this matter.

    [Return to blog post](https://watchaudits.com/officer-adams-cache-county-sheriffs-office/)

    #26185 Reply
    CBKN76
    Keymaster

    In January 2019, Officer Adams confiscated and destroyed an inmate’s rune paper, which the inmate claimed was related to his Asatru religion. The inmate alleged this action violated his rights to due process and free exercise of religion. The court found that the officer’s actions did not constitute a violation of clearly established constitutional rights, and the case was dismissed.

    [Return to blog post](https://watchaudits.com/officer-adams-cache-county-sheriffs-office-2/)

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Reply To: Reply #26185 in Officer Adams
Your information:




Welcome to Police Accountability Database

Our Mission

We're building a comprehensive database of police interactions to promote accountability and transparency in law enforcement.

How You Can Participate

  • View the Blog: Read about documented police interactions
  • Share Your Experience: Submit your own police interaction story
  • Browse the Forums: Check if your local law enforcement has been documented

Important Community Guidelines

It is strictly against our rules to:

  • Make threats of any kind
  • Share private information such as personal emails, home addresses, or phone numbers

Violation of these rules will result in immediate content removal and possible account suspension.

Why This Matters

By organizing this data, we can potentially demonstrate when officers were previously aware of laws they later claim ignorance of, challenging qualified immunity defenses and promoting accountability.