Officer Gonzalez – Marlboro Police Department

Home Forums Massachusetts Marlboro Police Department Officer Gonzalez – Marlboro Police Department

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #14533 Reply
    CBKN76
    Keymaster

    In the case of Mazur v. Township of Marlboro, Officer Gonzalez was involved in an incident on February 17, 2010, where she responded to a domestic disturbance call. During the encounter, Officer Gonzalez punched the plaintiff, Ms. Mazur, resulting in serious injuries including a shattered left orbit that required surgery. The court found that there were genuine disputes of material fact regarding whether Officer Gonzalez’s use of force was excessive and whether she was entitled to qualified immunity. Additionally, the court noted that Officer Gonzalez had eleven previous internal affairs complaints within a five-year period, raising concerns about the adequacy of the department’s internal investigations and training protocols. The case highlighted potential systemic issues within the Marlboro Police Department, including a possible custom of tolerating excessive force and inadequate officer training.

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
Reply To: Officer Gonzalez – Marlboro Police Department
Your information:




Welcome to Police Accountability Database

Our Mission

We're building a comprehensive database of police interactions to promote accountability and transparency in law enforcement.

How You Can Participate

  • View the Blog: Read about documented police interactions
  • Share Your Experience: Submit your own police interaction story
  • Browse the Forums: Check if your local law enforcement has been documented

Important Community Guidelines

It is strictly against our rules to:

  • Make threats of any kind
  • Share private information such as personal emails, home addresses, or phone numbers

Violation of these rules will result in immediate content removal and possible account suspension.

Why This Matters

By organizing this data, we can potentially demonstrate when officers were previously aware of laws they later claim ignorance of, challenging qualified immunity defenses and promoting accountability.