Officer Micah Host

Home Forums Alabama Hartselle Police Department Officer Micah Host

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #3539 Reply
    CBKN76
    Keymaster

    On May 14, 2017, Officer Micah Host responded to a domestic disturbance call at the residence of Michael Welch, a deaf man. Despite knowing Welch’s hearing impairment, Host failed to communicate effectively, leading to a physical altercation where Welch was tased, resulting in the destruction of one of his cochlear implants. Welch was arrested and charged with disorderly conduct and resisting arrest; however, these charges were dismissed on appeal. Welch filed a lawsuit alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act, claiming the officers failed to accommodate his disability. The court dismissed the claims against the City of Hartselle but did not address the claims against the individual officers. The case highlights issues of excessive force and failure to accommodate disabilities during police interactions. [Source: Welch v. City of Hartselle Alabama et al, No. 5:2019cv00731 – Document 34 (N.D. Ala. 2019)]

    [Return to blog post](https://watchaudits.com/officer-micah-host-hartselle-police-department/)

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
Reply To: Officer Micah Host
Your information:




Welcome to Police Accountability Database

Our Mission

We're building a comprehensive database of police interactions to promote accountability and transparency in law enforcement.

How You Can Participate

  • View the Blog: Read about documented police interactions
  • Share Your Experience: Submit your own police interaction story
  • Browse the Forums: Check if your local law enforcement has been documented

Important Community Guidelines

It is strictly against our rules to:

  • Make threats of any kind
  • Share private information such as personal emails, home addresses, or phone numbers

Violation of these rules will result in immediate content removal and possible account suspension.

Why This Matters

By organizing this data, we can potentially demonstrate when officers were previously aware of laws they later claim ignorance of, challenging qualified immunity defenses and promoting accountability.