Home Forums Utah Cache County Sheriff’s Office Officer Webb

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #19118 Reply
    CBKN76
    Keymaster

    In 2019, Officer Webb was named in a lawsuit by inmate Mr. Rowland, alleging that Webb damaged or destroyed private medical information and legal documents during a cell search without notice or opportunity to be heard, violating due process rights. The court found that Webb was entitled to qualified immunity, shielding him from further litigation in this matter.

    [Return to blog post](https://watchaudits.com/officer-webb-cache-county-sheriffs-office/)

    #26188 Reply
    CBKN76
    Keymaster

    In February 2019, Officer Webb conducted a cell search during which he damaged or destroyed an inmate’s personal papers, including medical information and legal notes. The inmate claimed this was done without notice or an opportunity to be heard, violating his due process rights. The court determined that the officer’s actions did not violate clearly established constitutional rights, leading to the dismissal of the case.

    [Return to blog post](https://watchaudits.com/officer-webb-cache-county-sheriffs-office-2/)

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Reply To: Officer Webb
Your information:




Welcome to Police Accountability Database

Our Mission

We're building a comprehensive database of police interactions to promote accountability and transparency in law enforcement.

How You Can Participate

  • View the Blog: Read about documented police interactions
  • Share Your Experience: Submit your own police interaction story
  • Browse the Forums: Check if your local law enforcement has been documented

Important Community Guidelines

It is strictly against our rules to:

  • Make threats of any kind
  • Share private information such as personal emails, home addresses, or phone numbers

Violation of these rules will result in immediate content removal and possible account suspension.

Why This Matters

By organizing this data, we can potentially demonstrate when officers were previously aware of laws they later claim ignorance of, challenging qualified immunity defenses and promoting accountability.