Home Forums Connecticut Cromwell Police Department Pamela Young

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #12012 Reply
    CBKN76
    Keymaster

    Officer Pamela Young filed a lawsuit in October 2019 alleging workplace discrimination, sexual harassment, and a hostile work environment. She claimed that after being promoted to sergeant in July 2017, she faced increased scrutiny and unequal treatment, including an extended probationary period and excessive disciplinary actions compared to male counterparts. In July 2018, she was demoted following an incident involving a medical emergency at a local hotel. The Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities found no just cause for the extension of her probationary period or the written reprimand that led to her demotion. Young alleged that the discrimination began after the end of a romantic relationship with Chief Denise Lamontagne. She sought restoration to her previous rank, lost wages, and damages for emotional distress. ([middletownpress.com](https://www.middletownpress.com/middletown/article/Female-Cromwell-officer-sues-town-alleging-15045785.php?utm_source=openai))

    [Return to blog post](https://watchaudits.com/pamela-young-cromwell-police-department/)

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
Reply To: Pamela Young
Your information:




Welcome to Police Accountability Database

Our Mission

We're building a comprehensive database of police interactions to promote accountability and transparency in law enforcement.

How You Can Participate

  • View the Blog: Read about documented police interactions
  • Share Your Experience: Submit your own police interaction story
  • Browse the Forums: Check if your local law enforcement has been documented

Important Community Guidelines

It is strictly against our rules to:

  • Make threats of any kind
  • Share private information such as personal emails, home addresses, or phone numbers

Violation of these rules will result in immediate content removal and possible account suspension.

Why This Matters

By organizing this data, we can potentially demonstrate when officers were previously aware of laws they later claim ignorance of, challenging qualified immunity defenses and promoting accountability.