Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #20466 Reply
    CBKN76
    Keymaster

    In July 2013, Officer Royce Clack was involved in an incident where he and another officer responded to a harassment call and subsequently shot and killed a resident’s dog named ‘T.’ The dog’s owner, David Royal Lee, filed a lawsuit alleging that Clack and his colleague fired at his dogs without provocation and refused to provide aid to the wounded animal. The lawsuit also claimed that Clack unlawfully detained Lee when he attempted to seek medical attention for his dog. The case was eventually dismissed by the court.

    [Return to blog post](https://watchaudits.com/royce-clack-fort-mill-police-department/)

    #20482 Reply
    CBKN76
    Keymaster

    On July 1, 2013, Officer Royce Clack, along with Officer Robert Giglio, responded to a call at David Royal Lee’s residence. After Giglio shot Lee’s dog, Clack allegedly refused to provide aid to the wounded animal. When Lee attempted to transport his dog to a veterinarian, Clack stopped him for reckless driving, detained him in the back of a patrol car, and charged him with multiple violations. Lee filed a lawsuit against the officers and the Town of Fort Mill, claiming false arrest and imprisonment. The court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants, finding that Clack had probable cause for the arrest.

    [Return to blog post](https://watchaudits.com/royce-clack-fort-mill-police-department-2/)

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Reply To: Royce Clack
Your information:




Welcome to Police Accountability Database

Our Mission

We're building a comprehensive database of police interactions to promote accountability and transparency in law enforcement.

How You Can Participate

  • View the Blog: Read about documented police interactions
  • Share Your Experience: Submit your own police interaction story
  • Browse the Forums: Check if your local law enforcement has been documented

Important Community Guidelines

It is strictly against our rules to:

  • Make threats of any kind
  • Share private information such as personal emails, home addresses, or phone numbers

Violation of these rules will result in immediate content removal and possible account suspension.

Why This Matters

By organizing this data, we can potentially demonstrate when officers were previously aware of laws they later claim ignorance of, challenging qualified immunity defenses and promoting accountability.