- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 2 weeks ago by .
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Create And Track Police Department History
Home › Forums › Vermont › Windham County Sheriff’s Department › Sheriff Sheila Prue
In 2006, Sheriff Sheila Prue was investigated following an anonymous tip alleging misconduct involving financial mismanagement and misuse of department resources. The state auditor’s office conducted a thorough investigation, uncovering evidence of embezzlement and other financial irregularities. Prue was charged with felony embezzlement and two misdemeanors. She agreed to plead guilty, resign from her position, and repay $36,000 to the county. An anonymous donor paid the remaining $26,000 of her restitution, leading to the expungement of her felony record. Prue did not serve any jail time.
[Return to blog post](https://watchaudits.com/sheriff-sheila-prue-windham-county-sheriffs-department/)
In 2006, Sheriff Sheila Prue was investigated following an anonymous tip alleging misconduct involving financial mismanagement and misuse of department resources. The state auditor’s office conducted a thorough investigation, uncovering evidence of embezzlement and other financial irregularities. Prue was charged with felony embezzlement and two misdemeanors. She agreed to plead guilty, resign from her position, and repay $36,000 to the county. An anonymous donor paid the remaining $26,000 of her restitution, leading to the expungement of her felony record. Prue did not serve any jail time.
[Return to blog post](https://watchaudits.com/sheriff-sheila-prue-windham-county-sheriffs-department-2/)
We're building a comprehensive database of police interactions to promote accountability and transparency in law enforcement.
It is strictly against our rules to:
Violation of these rules will result in immediate content removal and possible account suspension.
By organizing this data, we can potentially demonstrate when officers were previously aware of laws they later claim ignorance of, challenging qualified immunity defenses and promoting accountability.