@cristinehouck50
Profile
Registered: 2 months, 3 weeks ago
Future-Proof Your Career with Continuous Professional Training
Why Most Professional Development Training Is Actually Making Your Team Worse
You know what gets me really annoyed? Walking into another corporate training room in the Melbourne city centre and watching 30 people check their phones while some consultant from Sydney drones on about "synergistic leadership paradigms."
After nearly two decades in this business, I think about most of workplace training is a waste of everyone's time. Its not that the material is terrible, its just completely separated from reality on the ground.
The thing that frustrates me most is watching organisations copy international training formats without considering whether they make sense here. Meanwhile, Sarah from accounts is juggling two kids, overtime, and trying to figure out the new software system that IT rolled out last Tuesday without any proper training.
Actual development takes place during real work situations. Its watching experienced team members deal with challenging situations and learning from their approach. Its observing how the best performers handle tricky conversations and adapting their methods. Its getting things wrong in the real world and developing better approaches through experience.
Now, this might be controversial, but I actually believe structured training can work really well. If they are designed and delivered correctly, which rarely happens.
The issue kicked off when businesses started measuring HR success by how much they spent on external development programs. Management skills turned into some sort of academic pursuit requiring qualifications rather than practical experience.
There was this mining operation in Perth I worked with not long ago. They had spent $80,000 on a leadership program that taught their supervisors about "genuine conversation techniques" and "transformational management approaches." Pretty sophisticated content. The actual problem was team leaders avoiding tough conversations about workplace safety because they didnt know how to handle them.
Guess what fixed it? Getting supervisors to shadow experienced ones for two weeks. Cost them maybe $3,000 in overtime. Results were straight away.
This need for official training credentials is ruining real world skill building. Not everything needs a certificate. Sometimes the best professional development is giving someone a challenging project and proper support to figure it out.
Speaking of support , that's where most programs fall apart completely. They send people off to training, everyone gets motivated for about a week, then its back to the same old systems and processes that created the problems in the first place.
The team at Westpac handles this brilliantly. Their leadership program offers six months of ongoing support once the classroom sessions finish. Makes sense. Because changing how people work takes time and reinforcement, not just awareness.
Let me focus on what actually succeeds, since complaining without solutions helps nobody.
Start with relevance. For training store supervisors, stick to real shop floor examples. Genuine examples, not invented scenarios about imaginary businesses. Use your actual customer complaints, your real staffing issues, your specific compliance requirements.
Next, when you deliver training is more important than what you deliver. Training someone on delegation skills right before they get promoted? Perfect. Training them six months later when they have already developed bad habits? Nearly impossible.
The third point, which most initiatives totally overlook, is fixing the workplace culture rather than just developing individuals. There's no point developing communication abilities if the company structure discourages honest feedback. You are basically guaranteeing failure.
I worked with a small logistics company in Brisbane last year . Their drivers kept getting customer complaints about communication. Before arranging training courses, we examined what was genuinely occurring. It emerged that the dispatch system was giving them impossible delivery windows, so they were constantly running late and stressed. Corrected the timing issues, complaints fell by more than half.
No amount of workshops would have fixed that problem. System improvements did.
Here's something that will upset people : soft skills training is mostly backwards. We teach people how to be better communicators, better leaders, better team players. However, we fail to develop critical thinking about workplace dysfunction or skills to challenge problematic processes.
Quality professional growth builds people who spot issues and resolve them, rather than individuals who simply endure organisational problems better.
Having said that, certain conventional development methods are effective. Technical development training is usually pretty solid because its testable and specific. You either know how to use the new software or you do not. Sales training can be effective if its based on actual customer data and market conditions.
Yet management training? Team building exercises? Communication seminars? Half the time they are just costly ways to avoid dealing with real management problems.
Businesses that excel at development treat it like any other important business decision. They assess impact, follow progress, and adapt methods according to what produces results. They resist booking programs just because the budget needs spending or because professional development is fashionable.
Canva's approach to professional development is interesting. Their emphasis is on team member learning and sharing expertise internally. Employees training employees. It expands easily, remains applicable, and creates better team connections.
That's actually where the future of professional development is moving. Fewer structured workshops, more workplace learning, coaching, and hands on development. Businesses are learning that quality development involves offering substantial projects with appropriate guidance.
Naturally, many development companies keep selling the same tired content wrapped in trendy terminology. Digital evolution training that's simply traditional change processes with modern terminology. Agile development programs that overlook whether your company can realistically put in place agile approaches.
The secret is asking smarter questions before scheduling any development. What exact behavioural change or skill deficiency requires attention? How will you know if it's working? What's preventing people from already doing this well? What support will they need after the training?
Crucially, what's the real business challenge you're attempting to fix? When professional growth is not tied to actual business improvements, you're merely following procedures and losing money.
Professional growth works when it's intentional, focused, and adequately resourced. Everything else is just pricey team bonding that makes people feel good for a few days before reality kicks back in.
That might sound cynical, but after watching hundreds of training programs over the years, l'd rather be honest about what works than keep pretending every workshop is going to transform your workplace culture.
Effective professional growth happens when people encounter difficulties, get assistance, and address actual business problems. All other approaches are simply administrative costs.
When you cherished this informative article in addition to you desire to get details relating to Training Providers Perth generously check out our website.
Website: https://assuranceonline.bigcartel.com/posts
Forums
Topics Started: 0
Replies Created: 0
Forum Role: Participant