@finneugene
Profile
Registered: 2 months, 1 week ago
Why Lifelong Learning Is the Key to Professional Success
Why Most Professional Development Training Is Actually Making Your Team Worse
Nothing irritates me more than watching perfectly competent people zone out during costly training sessions because the content has zero connection to their actual job.
Seventeen years of consulting has taught me that roughly three quarters of professional development programs miss the mark completely. Its not that the material is terrible, its just completely disconnected from reality on the ground.
Here's the thing that absolutely frustrates me. We keep bringing in these overseas training models that assume everyone's got massive budgets and time to sit through three day workshops about emotional intelligence. Meanwhile, Sarah from accounts is managing two kids, overtime, and trying to figure out the new software system that IT rolled out last Tuesday without any proper training.
Genuine skill building occurs on the job. Its picking up techniques from colleagues who have been there and done that. Its learning from people who consistently get results in difficult situations. Its getting things wrong in the real world and developing better approaches through experience.
Now, this might be unpopular, but I actually believe structured training can work incredibly well. If they are designed and delivered correctly, which seldom happens.
This whole mess began when human resources teams started treating training budgets like a performance indicator. Management skills turned into some sort of academic pursuit requiring qualifications rather than practical experience.
I remember working with a mining company in Perth a few years back. They had thrown $85,000 at some leadership development project focused on "planned dialogue systems" and "flexible management approaches." Pretty sophisticated content. But their real issue was supervisors struggling to address safety concerns with their teams without causing conflict.
What solved it? Pairing inexperienced supervisors with seasoned ones for a fortnight. Cost them maybe $3,000 in overtime. Results were instant.
The fixation on certificates and credentials is destroying hands on development. You dont need paperwork for every skill. The best learning frequently happens when you give people tough assignments with adequate guidance.
When it comes to support , that's where most programs fall apart completely. People attend workshops, feel motivated for a few days, then return to the exact same workplace issues that caused the problems originally.
Westpac gets this right. Their branch manager development program includes six months of mentoring after the formal training ends. Makes sense. Transforming how teams operate needs sustained effort and feedback, not just initial education.
Time to discuss effective approaches, because criticism without alternatives is pointless.
First, make it relevant. For training store supervisors, stick to real shop floor examples. Genuine ones. Not made up case studies about fictional businesses. Focus on real complaints, true workforce problems, and specific industry obligations.
Next, timing matters more than content. Training someone on delegation skills right before they get promoted? Perfect. Training them six months later when they have already developed bad habits? Much harder.
Most importantly, and where nearly every program fails, you must change the system alongside developing the people. There's no point developing communication abilities if the company structure discourages honest feedback. That's a recipe for disappointment.
I worked with a small logistics company in Brisbane last year . Customers kept complaining about how the drivers communicated with them. Rather than booking communication workshops, we investigated the real causes. The logistics system was setting unreachable delivery targets, making drivers chronically late and frustrated. Fixed the scheduling, complaints fell by 60%.
No amount of workshops would have fixed that problem. System improvements did.
Here's something that will upset people : soft skills training is mostly backwards. We focus on making people better at talking, leading, and collaborating. But we dont teach them how to think critically about their work environment and push back when systems are broken.
Quality professional growth builds people who spot issues and resolve them, rather than individuals who simply endure organisational problems better.
Despite my criticisms, some standard training approaches actually succeed. Technical development tends to work well because you can measure results clearly. Either you can operate the new system or you can not. Sales training can be effective if its based on actual customer data and market conditions.
Yet management training? Team building exercises? Communication seminars? Frequently they are pricey techniques for dodging actual management issues.
Businesses that excel at development treat it like any other important business decision. They assess impact, follow progress, and adapt methods according to what produces results. They avoid scheduling development simply because funds are available or because upskilling is trendy.
The team at Canva takes an intriguing approach to development. Their emphasis is on colleague to colleague learning and sharing expertise internally. People teaching other people. Its expandable, its relevant, and it builds stronger internal networks.
This is genuinely where development is moving. Reduced formal sessions, increased practical learning, guidance, and experience based growth. Businesses are learning that quality development involves offering substantial projects with appropriate guidance.
Obviously, there are still plenty of training providers selling the same old recycled content dressed up with new buzzwords. Digital transformation workshops that are really just change management 101. Agile training that ignores whether your organisation is actually ready for agile methods.
The trick is posing better questions before arranging any professional growth activities. What specific behaviour or skill gap are you trying to address? How will you measure whether it's effective? Why are not people already performing at this level? What support will they need after the training?
Above all, what's the genuine organisational issue you're hoping to resolve? If development isn't linked to measurable business results, you're simply completing paperwork and squandering resources.
Professional development works when it's strategic, specific, and supported. Any other method is simply pricey group exercises that generate brief motivation before regular work challenges resume.
This may seem pessimistic, but after observing countless development programs, I prefer honesty about effectiveness over maintaining the illusion that every session will change your organisation.
The best professional development happens when people are challenged, supported, and given real problems to solve. Any other method is basically expensive beaurocracy.
Should you loved this information and you want to receive more details about Administration Training generously visit our own web-page.
Website: https://steadinesslocal.bigcartel.com/blog
Forums
Topics Started: 0
Replies Created: 0
Forum Role: Participant