@gabrielasandover
Profile
Registered: 2 months, 4 weeks ago
How Professional Development Shapes Organizational Success
What's Actually Wrong With Corporate Training Programs (And the Three Things That Actually Work)
Time to call out the complete nonsense that passes for professional development these days. I've been delivering training sessions across Melbourne, Sydney, and Brisbane for the past 17 years, and frankly? About most of what I see makes me want to throw my laptop out the window.
A few weeks back I attended what they called a development course that cost my client nearly five grand each. Four and a half bloody thousand dollars. For what? Two days of PowerPoint slides about "synergistic paradigm shifts" and role playing exercises that made grown executives pretend to be trees. Seriously! I'm not making this up.
Here's what nobody wants to tell you about professional development training. Most of it's created by people who've never actually managed a team, run a business, or dealt with real workplace drama. They've got their fancy certificates from organisations I've never heard of, but ask them to deal with a difficult conversation with an underperforming employee? They disappear faster than free donuts.
What's Actually Broken in Training
The training business has this weird obsession with making everything unnecessarily complex. I was at a conference in Perth last year where a presenter spent an hour and a half explaining a "revolutionary new framework" for giving feedback. Hour and a half! It boiled down to: give clear information quickly without being nasty. That's it. But somehow they'd turned it into a complicated method with acronyms and flowcharts.
What happens after training is even worse. Companies invest tens of thousands on these courses, everyone nods enthusiastically during the sessions, takes their little workbooks back to the office, and then... nothing. The workbooks end up in desk drawers alongside old business cards and USB cables that don't fit anything anymore.
I had a client in Adelaide who spent $23,000 on communication skills training for their management team. Half a year down the track, their employee satisfaction scores had actually gone down. Why? Because the training taught them to speak in corporate buzzwords instead of just having normal conversations.
This is what drives me absolutely mental. When I point this stuff out at industry meetups, everyone completely agrees, but then they continue using the same providers who deliver the same rehashed material. It's like we are all trapped in some sort of professional development Groundhog Day.
What Actually Works (Plot Twist: The Solutions Are Obvious)
Having seen countless training initiatives crash and burn, I've discovered that only a few key elements actually stick. All other stuff is overpriced showbiz.
The most effective approach: colleague to colleague learning. Not the formal mentoring schemes where someone gets matched with a mentor they've never met and they have uncomfortable monthly catchups. I'm talking about getting half a dozen to eight folks from similar roles together on a consistent basis to actually solve real issues they're facing right now.
I set one up for operations managers in factories across the outer suburbs. No formal structure or rules, just pizza and honest conversations about the stuff that causes them sleepless nights. They've been meeting for nearly half a decade. That's impressive staying power! That's longer than some people stay in jobs.
The group tackled everything from handling problematic contractors to keeping people connected while working from home. Actual challenges, practical answers, measurable results. Someone in the network figured out how to reduce his team's overtime by two fifths just by implementing what another member had tried six months earlier.
What also works brilliantly: following the experts with people who are actually good at what they do. Not job shadowing with whoever's free when it suits, but with people who've truly excelled in their area.
I organised for a digital marketing specialist to spend 72 hours with the head of marketing at Qantas. Just 72 hours. She learned more about running marketing campaigns and managing relationships than she had in 24 months of structured learning. The senior marketing leader loved it too because it forced her to really think about why she makes certain decisions.
Getting the combination right is crucial. You can't just match anyone with anyone. But when you find the perfect match? Magic happens.
The final approach that works: project based learning where people have to apply something new while they're learning it. Not pretend situations or outdated examples from failed businesses, but real projects with real consequences.
I worked with a financial services company where we identified actual process improvements each participant could make in their role. They spent the training course building those improvements, getting feedback from colleagues, iterating, tracking results. By the end of the course, they'd already fixed real improvements and could see the results in their daily work.
Common Mistakes in Training
I know this seems contradictory, but the majority of development initiatives attempt too much. They want to transform someone's entire leadership style in two days. It's ridiculous.
The best changes I've seen happen when people zero in on one specific skill and practice it until it becomes second nature. Like really automatic, not just until they can remember to do it when they're thinking about it.
I had one executive who was awful at giving constructive feedback. Instead of sending her to a general leadership course, we zeroed in solely on feedback conversations. She practiced the same basic structure until she could do it naturally Three months later, her team's performance had increased substantially, not because she'd become a fantastic manager instantly, but because she'd perfected one crucial skill properly.
Another issue that annoys me is the obsession with psychological assessments. DISC, Myers Briggs, personality typing, colour profiling. Companies spend thousands on these things, and for what? So people can say "I'm a red personality, that's why I hate meetings" and use it as an excuse to sidestep difficult discussions?
They're not entirely useless, understanding yourself matters. But these tests often become excuses rather than development opportunities. I've seen teams where people won't collaborate because their personality types supposedly don't match. It's psychological horoscopes for the corporate world.
The Money Question
Time to address the money side because that's what genuinely important. The majority of development initiatives lack metrics beyond "feedback forms" and participation numbers. It's like rating a movie by how many people stay until the end instead of whether the food actually tastes decent.
Successful development monitors actual improvements and business impact. Real numbers, not fuzzy feelings. The peer learning groups I mentioned? They track specific issues solved and money saved. Those workplace observation schemes? We measure skill improvements through 360 degree feedback and regular evaluations.
A production business calculated that their peer learning program saved them over a third of a million dollars in its first year through operational improvements alone. That's a decent return on the cost of periodic catering and space rental.
Where This Leaves Us
Look, I don't have all the answers. I've made lots of errors over the years. I once created a leadership program that was so boring I fell asleep during my own presentation. Serioulsy. The customer disappeared completely.
What I've figured out that the best professional development happens when people are addressing real challenges with real consequences, receiving mentoring from those who've walked the path, and zeroing in on specific skills they can practice until they become completely natural.
The rest? It's just costly performance that makes executives feel like they're developing their workforce without actually making a genuine difference.
Maybe that's too harsh. Possibly those team building exercises actually work for some people. But after nearly two decades of watching companies throw money at training that doesn't stick, I'd rather invest in approaches that create real change.
If you liked this posting and you would like to obtain a lot more information relating to Self Directed Training kindly take a look at our web-site.
Website: https://harmonycoach.bigcartel.com/blog
Forums
Topics Started: 0
Replies Created: 0
Forum Role: Participant