@hugooneal192
Profile
Registered: 3 months, 1 week ago
How Time Planning Training Is Useless in Poorly-Run Organizations
Quit Teaching People to "Prioritize" When Your Business Has Zero Clue What Really Matters: Why Time Planning Training Doesn't Work in Dysfunctional Organizations
I'm ready to demolish one of the biggest widespread myths in corporate training: the belief that showing employees better "time organization" methods will solve efficiency issues in organizations that have zero clear priorities themselves.
With seventeen years of consulting with businesses on efficiency problems, I can tell you that task organization training in a chaotic company is like showing someone to sort their possessions while their building is currently on fire around them.
This is the basic problem: nearly all organizations experiencing from productivity crises do not have efficiency challenges - they have organizational dysfunction.
Conventional task organization training believes that organizations have clear, reliable objectives that workers can be trained to understand and focus with. Such belief is completely separated from the real world in the majority of contemporary workplaces.
We consulted with a major advertising firm where workers were constantly complaining about being "failing to organize their work effectively." Executives had invested enormous amounts on priority management training for each employees.
Their training featured all the usual approaches: urgency-importance systems, ABC classification systems, schedule organization methods, and detailed project tracking software.
However efficiency continued to decline, worker frustration rates increased, and work completion results turned worse, not improved.
When I analyzed what was actually going on, I found the actual cause: the agency itself had absolutely no stable strategic focus.
Here's what the typical situation looked like for employees:
Monday: Senior leadership would communicate that Project A was the "highest objective" and each employee should to focus on it right away
Tuesday: A another executive leader would send an "critical" message declaring that Project B was actually the "most critical" priority
Day three: Yet another department head would organize an "emergency" conference to announce that Project C was a "must-have" deliverable that had to be completed by Friday
Day four: The original top leader would express frustration that Client A had not advanced enough and insist to know why employees weren't "working on" it correctly
By week's end: All three clients would be delayed, multiple deadlines would be failed, and employees would be blamed for "poor time management abilities"
Such pattern was happening continuously after week, month after month. Absolutely no level of "priority management" training was able to assist employees manage this organizational chaos.
This basic issue wasn't that employees did not learn how to prioritize - it was that the organization at every level was totally incapable of establishing clear strategic focus for more than 72 hours at a time.
The team convinced management to eliminate their focus on "individual task management" training and instead create what I call "Strategic Priority Systems."
Instead of trying to train staff to prioritize within a dysfunctional system, we concentrated on building genuine strategic direction:
Established a single senior decision-making team with defined power for determining and preserving company focus
Implemented a formal priority review procedure that happened regularly rather than constantly
Created clear standards for when priorities could be changed and what degree of approval was required for such modifications
Created required notification procedures to make certain that each focus changes were shared clearly and consistently across all teams
Implemented protection periods where zero priority modifications were permitted without exceptional circumstances
This transformation was remarkable and outstanding:
Staff frustration levels dropped dramatically as staff for the first time knew what they were required to be working on
Productivity increased by over significantly within a month and a half as employees could really concentrate on completing work rather than repeatedly redirecting between multiple priorities
Project completion times got better considerably as departments could organize and deliver tasks without daily changes and modifications
Client relationships improved substantially as projects were consistently delivered as promised and to standards
The point: before you show staff to organize, make sure your company really has stable direction that are deserving of focusing on.
This is a different way that time planning training fails in poorly-run workplaces: by assuming that workers have actual control over their time and priorities.
The team consulted with a public sector agency where workers were continuously getting blamed for "poor priority planning" and required to "productivity" training sessions.
This truth was that these employees had virtually absolutely no authority over their daily activities. Let me describe what their average workday seemed like:
Roughly the majority of their workday was taken up by compulsory sessions that they had no option to skip, regardless of whether these conferences were necessary to their actual work
A further 20% of their time was assigned to filling out mandatory documentation and paperwork requirements that added zero usefulness to their real job or to the citizens they were supposed to serve
This final 20% of their schedule was expected to be used for their real responsibilities - the tasks they were paid to do and that genuinely was important to the public
But even this tiny amount of time was regularly disrupted by "emergency" requirements, last-minute conferences, and management requirements that couldn't be delayed
Given these constraints, no level of "time planning" training was going to assist these staff get more efficient. Their problem wasn't their individual time management abilities - it was an organizational framework that ensured productive activity virtually unachievable.
We assisted them establish systematic changes to address the actual barriers to efficiency:
Eliminated unnecessary sessions and implemented specific criteria for when gatherings were really required
Streamlined bureaucratic requirements and got rid of redundant documentation requirements
Established dedicated periods for real job activities that would not be interrupted by administrative tasks
Developed defined procedures for deciding what represented a real "emergency" versus normal requests that could be planned for appropriate periods
Implemented workload sharing systems to ensure that work was shared appropriately and that not any individual was overburdened with impossible responsibilities
Staff productivity increased significantly, job happiness improved considerably, and their agency actually started providing higher quality results to the citizens they were meant to support.
That important lesson: you cannot address productivity challenges by showing people to work more effectively productively within broken organizations. Organizations need to fix the systems first.
At this point let's examine possibly the greatest laughable component of priority planning training in poorly-run organizations: the assumption that workers can magically manage tasks when the management itself modifies its direction numerous times per month.
The team worked with a technology business where the CEO was famous for going through "innovative" revelations several times per week and demanding the whole organization to right away shift to pursue each new idea.
Workers would show up at work on any given day with a defined knowledge of their tasks for the period, only to find that the CEO had concluded overnight that all priorities they had been focusing on was suddenly not important and that they needed to right away start concentrating on a project completely different.
Such cycle would happen several times per week. Initiatives that had been declared as "critical" would be abandoned before completion, groups would be repeatedly redirected to different initiatives, and massive amounts of effort and investment would be squandered on work that were not completed.
The company had poured significantly in "agile task management" training and advanced task organization systems to enable employees "respond efficiently" to shifting directions.
However zero degree of skill development or systems could overcome the core issue: you won't be able to successfully organize perpetually shifting priorities. Continuous modification is the antithesis of successful organization.
We worked with them establish what I call "Strategic Priority Management":
Implemented scheduled planning planning sessions where significant direction changes could be discussed and implemented
Developed firm requirements for what represented a valid justification for adjusting established priorities beyond the scheduled planning periods
Created a "priority consistency" period where no changes to established directions were permitted without extraordinary circumstances
Created defined communication procedures for when direction changes were absolutely required, featuring thorough impact assessments of what initiatives would be delayed
Established formal sign-off from several leaders before any significant direction modifications could be enacted
The improvement was dramatic. In three months, real work delivery statistics increased by more than dramatically. Staff burnout instances fell significantly as people could actually focus on delivering tasks rather than repeatedly starting new ones.
Innovation remarkably got better because departments had enough opportunity to completely develop and refine their ideas rather than constantly moving to new projects before anything could be fully completed.
The lesson: successful prioritization needs directions that remain unchanged long enough for employees to genuinely concentrate on them and complete significant progress.
Let me share what I've discovered after decades in this business: time organization training is only effective in companies that already have their organizational systems together.
When your workplace has stable organizational objectives, realistic workloads, effective leadership, and systems that enable rather than hinder productive activity, then priority organization training can be beneficial.
But if your workplace is marked by continuous dysfunction, conflicting messages, poor organization, impossible workloads, and reactive decision-making approaches, then time organization training is more counterproductive than ineffective - it's actively harmful because it blames employee performance for organizational failures.
End wasting time on priority management training until you've fixed your systemic dysfunction first.
Focus on building workplaces with clear strategic direction, effective decision-making, and processes that actually enable meaningful activity.
Company workers will organize perfectly well once you give them direction suitable for working toward and an environment that really supports them in completing their work. carrying excessive load with unsustainable workloads
Employee effectiveness increased significantly, job happiness increased notably, and this organization genuinely started offering higher quality outcomes to the community they were intended to help.
The crucial lesson: you won't be able to solve time management problems by teaching people to function more successfully within broken structures. Companies need to repair the systems initially.
Now let's address possibly the greatest absurd component of task planning training in dysfunctional organizations: the idea that employees can somehow prioritize work when the organization at leadership level shifts its priorities several times per month.
The team worked with a software business where the executive leadership was famous for going through "game-changing" ideas multiple times per day and demanding the whole team to right away redirect to implement each new idea.
Employees would come at the office on Monday with a clear understanding of their priorities for the week, only to discover that the management had concluded overnight that everything they had been working on was suddenly not relevant and that they must to instantly begin concentrating on something entirely different.
This cycle would happen several times per week. Projects that had been stated as "highest priority" would be forgotten halfway through, groups would be continuously moved to alternative initiatives, and massive portions of resources and work would be squandered on projects that were not delivered.
The company had invested heavily in "flexible project planning" training and complex priority tracking software to assist staff "respond quickly" to changing requirements.
Yet no amount of education or software could solve the fundamental issue: organizations won't be able to successfully prioritize constantly changing objectives. Perpetual shifting is the enemy of effective prioritization.
I worked with them create what I call "Focused Objective Consistency":
Implemented scheduled planning planning sessions where significant priority adjustments could be considered and adopted
Created clear standards for what constituted a legitimate justification for adjusting established objectives beyond the regular review sessions
Established a "priority consistency" time where no adjustments to established priorities were acceptable without emergency approval
Established specific communication systems for when objective modifications were genuinely necessary, with full impact evaluations of what work would be interrupted
Mandated formal sign-off from senior stakeholders before any major strategy modifications could be implemented
Their change was outstanding. Within three months, real initiative delivery percentages improved by nearly three times. Employee burnout instances dropped significantly as staff could at last work on completing work rather than continuously initiating new ones.
Creativity actually increased because groups had adequate time to completely develop and refine their concepts rather than constantly changing to new initiatives before anything could be adequately finished.
That reality: good prioritization requires directions that remain stable long enough for people to genuinely work on them and complete substantial outcomes.
Let me share what I've discovered after decades in this field: time organization training is merely effective in organizations that genuinely have their strategic priorities functioning.
When your organization has consistent business objectives, realistic expectations, competent management, and processes that facilitate rather than obstruct efficient activity, then task organization training can be useful.
But if your company is marked by continuous chaos, competing priorities, inadequate planning, unrealistic expectations, and emergency management approaches, then priority management training is worse than pointless - it's systematically destructive because it faults employee performance for leadership failures.
Quit squandering time on task planning training until you've addressed your organizational dysfunction first.
Focus on building organizations with stable strategic focus, competent leadership, and systems that really support meaningful activity.
The employees can manage tasks just fine once you give them something deserving of working toward and an environment that genuinely facilitates them in doing their jobs.
If you liked this short article and you would certainly such as to get even more info pertaining to Minute Takers Training Brisbane kindly go to the website.
Website: https://etrainingcompany.bigcartel.com/how-to-manage-a-difficult-employees
Forums
Topics Started: 0
Replies Created: 0
Forum Role: Participant
