Audits

Frank Sloup – Pinal County Sheriff’s Office

Written by CBKN76

Frank Sloup, a deputy with the Pinal County Sheriff’s Office, has a history of disciplinary issues. He resigned from the Scottsdale Police Department and the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office under circumstances that led to attempts to revoke his AZPOST certification (Case #02/54 and Case #17-148) and placement on the Brady List (Brady Offense No. 1632168525 – 1704088618). Allegations include altering official documents and untruthfulness. Additionally, Sloup has faced multiple civil lawsuits alleging excessive use of force and unlawful detention, including cases such as Emerson v. Maricopa County and Gordon vs. Sloup. Despite this history, Pinal County hired him, and he has been featured as the face of their organization on social media.

## Officer Forum Links:
– [Frank Sloup](https://watchaudits.com/forums/topic/frank-sloup/)

Forum Links

Browse Arizona Forums Browse Pinal County Sheriff's Office Browse Frank Sloup
Posted in Audits Law Enforcement Agencies: Officer Names: States:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Welcome to Police Accountability Database

Our Mission

We're building a comprehensive database of police interactions to promote accountability and transparency in law enforcement.

How You Can Participate

  • View the Blog: Read about documented police interactions
  • Share Your Experience: Submit your own police interaction story
  • Browse the Forums: Check if your local law enforcement has been documented

Important Community Guidelines

It is strictly against our rules to:

  • Make threats of any kind
  • Share private information such as personal emails, home addresses, or phone numbers

Violation of these rules will result in immediate content removal and possible account suspension.

Why This Matters

By organizing this data, we can potentially demonstrate when officers were previously aware of laws they later claim ignorance of, challenging qualified immunity defenses and promoting accountability.