Gerald J. Peters Jr. – Torrington Police Department

In May 2020, Sgt. Gerald J. Peters Jr. used pepper spray on a handcuffed individual, Christopher Spetland, who was seated in a wheelchair and exhibiting combative behavior. Peters then removed Spetland from the wheelchair and forced him to the ground. This action was deemed a violation of the department’s use of force policy, leading to Peters’ termination in May 2021 after 19 years of service. In February 2023, a state labor arbitration board determined that Peters was wrongfully terminated and should be reinstated. However, in July 2023, Superior Court Judge Ann E. Lynch overturned this decision, concluding that reinstating an officer terminated for excessive force violates public policy. Subsequently, in July 2024, Peters filed a $100 million lawsuit against the city, Police Chief William Baldwin, Attorney Eric Daigle, and the Daigle Law Group, alleging civil rights violations, wrongful termination, emotional distress, and other claims.

## Officer Forum Links:
– [Gerald J. Peters Jr.](https://watchaudits.com/forums/topic/gerald-j-peters-jr/)

Forum Links

Posted in Audits Law Enforcement Agencies: Officer Names: States:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Welcome to Police Accountability Database

Our Mission

We're building a comprehensive database of police interactions to promote accountability and transparency in law enforcement.

How You Can Participate

  • View the Blog: Read about documented police interactions
  • Share Your Experience: Submit your own police interaction story
  • Browse the Forums: Check if your local law enforcement has been documented

Important Community Guidelines

It is strictly against our rules to:

  • Make threats of any kind
  • Share private information such as personal emails, home addresses, or phone numbers

Violation of these rules will result in immediate content removal and possible account suspension.

Why This Matters

By organizing this data, we can potentially demonstrate when officers were previously aware of laws they later claim ignorance of, challenging qualified immunity defenses and promoting accountability.