Harvey – Pima County Sheriff’s Department

Deputy Harvey testified in a criminal case that he struck an arrestee with the butt of his gun and later slapped the handcuffed and shackled individual. He claimed the slap was intended to prevent the arrestee from losing consciousness before medical personnel arrived. Sheriff Clarence Dupnik concluded that Harvey used excessive force, engaged in inappropriate interview techniques, and demonstrated poor judgment, leading to his termination. Harvey appealed the decision, and the Pima County Law Enforcement Merit System Council recommended lesser sanctions. The case was reviewed by the Arizona Supreme Court, which examined the council’s authority in modifying disciplinary actions. ([case-law.vlex.com](https://case-law.vlex.com/vid/pima-county-v-pima-894059920?utm_source=openai))

## Officer Forum Links:
– [Harvey](https://watchaudits.com/forums/topic/harvey/)

## Officer Forum Links:
– [Harvey](https://watchaudits.com/forums/topic/harvey/)

Forum Links

Posted in Audits Law Enforcement Agencies: Officer Names: States:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Welcome to Police Accountability Database

Our Mission

We're building a comprehensive database of police interactions to promote accountability and transparency in law enforcement.

How You Can Participate

  • View the Blog: Read about documented police interactions
  • Share Your Experience: Submit your own police interaction story
  • Browse the Forums: Check if your local law enforcement has been documented

Important Community Guidelines

It is strictly against our rules to:

  • Make threats of any kind
  • Share private information such as personal emails, home addresses, or phone numbers

Violation of these rules will result in immediate content removal and possible account suspension.

Why This Matters

By organizing this data, we can potentially demonstrate when officers were previously aware of laws they later claim ignorance of, challenging qualified immunity defenses and promoting accountability.