Mark Warchol – Aiken County Sheriff’s Office

Former deputy Mark Warchol was terminated on July 24, 2013, after choking a man during a traffic stop on June 1, 2013. The incident occurred on U.S. 1 in Langley, where Warchol struck the individual twice in the face and placed his hand on the man’s throat, saying, ‘Do it again. Do it again.’ An internal investigation led to his dismissal for violating agency policy. In 2010, Warchol faced a federal lawsuit alleging he slammed a man’s head onto a patrol car during a traffic stop; the case was dismissed due to insufficient evidence. In 2016, he was named in another lawsuit involving excessive force during a traffic stop; he was later dropped as a defendant in that case. In 2023, Warchol was named in a federal lawsuit alleging his decision to chase a vehicle in Edgefield County caused a crash that injured a passenger. The lawsuit claims Warchol’s actions posed a danger to the community and resulted in severe injuries to the plaintiff.

## Officer Forum Links:
– [Mark Warchol](https://watchaudits.com/forums/topic/mark-warchol/)

Forum Links

Posted in Audits Law Enforcement Agencies: Officer Names: States:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Welcome to Police Accountability Database

Our Mission

We're building a comprehensive database of police interactions to promote accountability and transparency in law enforcement.

How You Can Participate

  • View the Blog: Read about documented police interactions
  • Share Your Experience: Submit your own police interaction story
  • Browse the Forums: Check if your local law enforcement has been documented

Important Community Guidelines

It is strictly against our rules to:

  • Make threats of any kind
  • Share private information such as personal emails, home addresses, or phone numbers

Violation of these rules will result in immediate content removal and possible account suspension.

Why This Matters

By organizing this data, we can potentially demonstrate when officers were previously aware of laws they later claim ignorance of, challenging qualified immunity defenses and promoting accountability.