Audits

Timothy Stoner – Pima Community College Police Department

Written by CBKN76

In 2010 and 2013, Officer Stoner, a veteran of active duty military deployments in Afghanistan and Iraq, applied for promotion to police corporal but was not selected. The Department of Justice alleged that his military service was a motivating factor in PCC’s decision to deny him promotion on both occasions. The former police chief, one of the selecting officials, demonstrated anti-military bias toward Stoner by making anti-military statements before and during the corporal selection process. In 2015, PCC settled the lawsuit by agreeing to provide Stoner with back pay and placing him in a regular police corporal position. Additionally, PCC amended its written personnel policies to advise employees of their rights and obligations under USERRA.

## Officer Forum Links:
– [Timothy Stoner](https://watchaudits.com/forums/topic/timothy-stoner/)

## Officer Forum Links:
– [Timothy Stoner](https://watchaudits.com/forums/topic/timothy-stoner/)

Forum Links

Browse Arizona Forums Browse Pima Community College Police Department Browse Timothy Stoner
Posted in Audits Law Enforcement Agencies: Officer Names: States:

Welcome to Police Accountability Database

Our Mission

We're building a comprehensive database of police interactions to promote accountability and transparency in law enforcement.

How You Can Participate

  • View the Blog: Read about documented police interactions
  • Share Your Experience: Submit your own police interaction story
  • Browse the Forums: Check if your local law enforcement has been documented

Important Community Guidelines

It is strictly against our rules to:

  • Make threats of any kind
  • Share private information such as personal emails, home addresses, or phone numbers

Violation of these rules will result in immediate content removal and possible account suspension.

Why This Matters

By organizing this data, we can potentially demonstrate when officers were previously aware of laws they later claim ignorance of, challenging qualified immunity defenses and promoting accountability.