Vanessa A. Mendoza – St. Johns Police Department

Case Timeline

April 17, 2013
In 2011, Officer Mendoza was involved in multiple incidents leading to her decertification. She was untruthful during an AZ POST interview and a City of St. Johns Personnel Board hearing. While off-duty at a public nightclub, she assaulted a uniformed Maricopa County Sheriff’s deputy who was working an off-duty assignment. Additionally, she brought a handcuffed subject to an isolated location after determining there was not enough evidence for an arrest and proceeded to touch and kiss her. Mendoza provided material false statements to the Federal Bureau of Investigations and continued to detain the subject after deciding there was insufficient evidence for an arrest. Her certification was revoked on April 17, 2013.
0

## Officer Forum Links:
– [Vanessa A. Mendoza](https://watchaudits.com/forums/topic/vanessa-a-mendoza/)

## Officer Forum Links:
– [Vanessa A. Mendoza](https://watchaudits.com/forums/topic/vanessa-a-mendoza/)

Forum Links

Posted in Audits Law Enforcement Agencies: Officer Names: States:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Welcome to Police Accountability Database

Our Mission

We're building a comprehensive database of police interactions to promote accountability and transparency in law enforcement.

How You Can Participate

  • View the Blog: Read about documented police interactions
  • Share Your Experience: Submit your own police interaction story
  • Browse the Forums: Check if your local law enforcement has been documented

Important Community Guidelines

It is strictly against our rules to:

  • Make threats of any kind
  • Share private information such as personal emails, home addresses, or phone numbers

Violation of these rules will result in immediate content removal and possible account suspension.

Why This Matters

By organizing this data, we can potentially demonstrate when officers were previously aware of laws they later claim ignorance of, challenging qualified immunity defenses and promoting accountability.